On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 6:54 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org >> wrote: > >> >> Any redistribution must obey the licensing requirements of the contents >> >> so you are right that our binary redistributions need to be checked as >> well, but as far as incubating projects are concerned it is IMO vital >> to get things right for the source releases first, and make sure >> podlings understand the difference between source code releases and >> convenience binaries. >> > > Based on recent discussion, a review of this distinction would be valuable > for many at Apache.
I very much second this. I think bringing some clarity at least into the areas of: #1 rules for complete source release tarballs #2 rules for complete binary convenience tarballs #3 rules for lose sources that appear in ASF Maven #4 rules for lose binaries that appear in ASF Maven To Bertrand's point ASF is clearly in business of producing #1. #2 at least has a nice property of being self-contained. #3 and #4 are the trickiest for me to get my head around. Thanks, Roman. P.S. Btw, am I missing any other way that we push anything that can be thought of as a release to ASF infrastrcture? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
