On 14 September 2014 13:39, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 14 September 2014 08:41, Srikanth Sundarrajan <srik...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > > Hello, > > We have reworked the release for Falcon 0.5 post feedback on LICENSE > and NOTICE from IPMC. Special thanks to Sebb, Justin Mclean and Chris > Douglas for helping us with this. > > > > A vote was held among the developers for this release candidate and the > release has been accepted. Details of the vote and the result can be found > at http://s.apache.org/falcon-0.5-rc5-dev-vote and > http://s.apache.org/falcon-0.5-rc5-dev-vote-result respectively. > > > > The source tar ball can be downloaded from > http://people.apache.org/~sriksun/0.5-incubating-rc5, along with > signature and checksum files. > > > > SHA1 checksum : 986d50b97710e252c1b6027dda9354b1c4127869 > > MD5 checksum: 33e6d2e4cea237be470020bb69a350f7 > > > Git tag for the release is > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-falcon.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-0.5-rc5 > > Git tags are not immutable - what is the hash for the tag? > > > More than 140 JIRAs have been closed as part of this release and the > release notes can be accessed from > http://s.apache.org/falcon-0.5-release-notes and the change logs are > available at http://s.apache.org/falcon-0.5-change-log > > > > The release has been signed through key(D2498DC9): > > http://s.apache.org/pgp-sriksun > > > > Keys to verify the signature of the release artifact are available at: > > http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/falcon/KEYS > > (BTW, the old release 0.3 should have been deleted by now; also 0.4 > should be removed from the dist/ directory shortly after 0.5 is > released. It is important to keep the release directory tidy [1]) > > [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#when-to-archive > > > > > Please vote on the release. Vote will expire on Sep 18, 2014 10:00AM IST. > > Votes don't expire. > They have a minimum time to closure of 72 hours. >
Hmmm it cant be that simple, if a vote does not expire a IPMC can vote -1 after a month, and invalidate a release that got the needed 3 +1. While I agree with you in principle, But I also assume that a -1 must be given within 72hours to count. Do we have a slight problem with the doc ? rgds jan i. > > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > > Regards > > Srikanth Sundarrajan > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
