My responses to each issue you listed are below...
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 4:29 AM, jan i <j...@apache.org> wrote: > > Having looked into the code and release discussion, its obvious that the > project still has some miles to go: > > - voting for the correct release (naming) > To avoid confusing released artifacts with unreleased artifacts, the project wants to emulate other Apache projects (e.g. Jake mentioned Mesos, Thrift) that vote on release files with a RC designation and then rename those files once release vote has been passed. > - dependencies missing in NOTICE > That was because some files were included in the release that are pulled in by the build process and should not be released We will omit those in our next RC. > - the release bits not being available in SVN at the time of voting > We have fixed this and are now using the correct SVN location for releases. > This is particulary important, because the PMC vote on one thing and you > release another, however small the changes, legally you have not voted on > whats being > released. > Yep. That is what we will do. > - Confusion about a library that should not have been included > This is the same issue as the NOTICE issue above. > - Images, which are part of the release, but are to be ignored. > Yep. Like a lot of Apache projects we ship some icons and images. Thanks everybody! - Dave
