Hi! Sorry for the delay -- OSCON and then a vacation (that was long promised to my family but never delivered) derailed my legislative agenda at IPMC ;-)
Attached is the proposed patch to the Incubator website detailing the policy. Please comment. Thanks, Roman. On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 11:47 PM, ant elder <ant.el...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 5:16 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> > wrote: > >> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 4:15 AM, Christian Grobmeier >> <grobme...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On 12 Jul 2014, at 8:05, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: >> >> That's actually the part of the thread that I have a lot of interest in. >> >> Is there any reason not to use attic for hibernated podlings? >> > >> > I am not sure if there is a real reason, but maybe its because the attic >> > currently contains only "real" ASF projects where all legal things were >> > sorted out. >> > >> > With a podling coming in this might not be the case. We would need to >> > check back with the Attic people if they can handle this. >> > >> > Otherwise I don't see a reason why we shouldn't use the attic, imho >> > its the reason why its there. >> >> Quick question: who's in charge of saying 'yay' or 'nay' to Incubator >> projects coming to the Attic? >> >> > Roman, would you mind to create an update patch and send it around >> > here for some kind of discussing/voting? Then we would see how people >> feel. >> > I think this thread is already to big to get the right attention. >> >> Will do shortly. Btw, I presume you're talking about the patch >> to the Incubator web pages documenting the policy, right? >> >> At least that's what I'm going to patch and send for a VOTE >> >> >> > What happpened to you agreeing to try it with a few of the old podlings > first? > > ...ant
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
