On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 4:15 AM, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 12 Jul 2014, at 8:05, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: >> That's actually the part of the thread that I have a lot of interest in. >> Is there any reason not to use attic for hibernated podlings? > > I am not sure if there is a real reason, but maybe its because the attic > currently contains only "real" ASF projects where all legal things were > sorted out. > > With a podling coming in this might not be the case. We would need to > check back with the Attic people if they can handle this. > > Otherwise I don't see a reason why we shouldn't use the attic, imho > its the reason why its there.
Quick question: who's in charge of saying 'yay' or 'nay' to Incubator projects coming to the Attic? > Roman, would you mind to create an update patch and send it around > here for some kind of discussing/voting? Then we would see how people feel. > I think this thread is already to big to get the right attention. Will do shortly. Btw, I presume you're talking about the patch to the Incubator web pages documenting the policy, right? At least that's what I'm going to patch and send for a VOTE Thanks, Roman. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org