On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 4:15 AM, Christian Grobmeier
<grobme...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12 Jul 2014, at 8:05, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> That's actually the part of the thread that I have a lot of interest in.
>> Is there any reason not to use attic for hibernated podlings?
>
> I am not sure if there is a real reason, but maybe its because the attic
> currently contains only "real" ASF projects where all legal things were
> sorted out.
>
> With a podling coming in this might not be the case. We would need to
> check back with the Attic people if they can handle this.
>
> Otherwise I don't see a reason why we shouldn't use the attic, imho
> its the reason why its there.

Quick question: who's in charge of saying 'yay' or 'nay' to Incubator
projects coming to the Attic?

> Roman, would you mind to create an update patch and send it around
> here for some kind of discussing/voting? Then we would see how people feel.
> I think this thread is already to big to get the right attention.

Will do shortly. Btw, I presume you're talking about the patch
to the Incubator web pages documenting the policy, right?

At least that's what I'm going to patch and send for a VOTE

Thanks,
Roman.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to