On 06/13/2014 05:17 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Personally, I don't feel this is a big deal. The PMC size is appropriate > given the overall project size. That said, I'd like to make two points: > * in general, for a smaller project like Celix I'd like to encourage folks > to consider PMC == committers
That is the case with Celix, correct? Looking at the status page, I only see "committers" and no PMC list. I would note that the number of PMC members concerns me a bit since the most recent release process took more than a month b/c there weren't enough VOTEs. That is somewhat tempered by the fact that the project seems to have added two PMC/committers since 1.0.0. Also of mild concern is that Celix missed its April report (it did report in May). Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
