IIRC, JSPWiki had exactly the same issue when it entered the incubator. There were a non-Apache release or two while it was incubating, using the non-Apache package names, hosted on non-Apache servers and announced on non-Apache mail lists.
Since it wasn't an Apache release, it was not announced on announce at apache.org but was announced on the Apache incubating user and dev lists. I think Storm could do the same. There is specific interest in the incubating Storm community but not general interest in the wider Apache community. Craig On Nov 15, 2013, at 7:10 AM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > Agreed. It will not be hosted or linked to from any Apache site. > > On another thread on the storm dev list, I have an open question as to > whether or not it’s okay to announce it (with a disclaimer that it is not an > Apache release) on the Apache mailing lists > dev/u...@storm.incubator.apache.org, or if any announcements should only go > to the google groups mailing list. > > - Taylor > > On Nov 15, 2013, at 10:02 AM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Also, if it's not an Apache release, it probaly should not be hosted and >> listed at Apache to avoid confusion. >> >> On Thursday, November 14, 2013, Ted Dunning wrote: >> >>> First few words should read "A disclaimer ..." >>> >>> I blame a combo of jet lag and *really* slow net link. Not the guy who hit >>> send without proofing, of course. >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Ted Dunning >>> <ted.dunn...@gmail.com<javascript:;>> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> I disclaimer to clarify that the 0.9.0 release is neither an Apache >>>> top-level project release nor an Apache incubator release is probably >>> good. >>>> A file name like DISCLAIMER might be good. >>>> >>>> I would worry about it being clear rather than being totally crafted by a >>>> true legal mind. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 4:48 AM, P. Taylor Goetz >>>> <ptgo...@gmail.com<javascript:;> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> The Strom project is just entering the incubator. We have promised our >>>>> community that we will issue a stable 0.9.0 release prior to switching >>> over >>>>> to the Apache release process. We are currently in a release candidate >>>>> process. >>>>> >>>>> Now that we are an Incubator project, but not yet releasing under the >>>>> Apache process, should we be including a disclaimer with our pre-Apache >>>>> releases stating so? >>>>> >>>>> It feels like we should have some sort legalese in place. >>>>> >>>>> - Taylor >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>>>> general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org<javascript:;> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: >>>>> general-h...@incubator.apache.org<javascript:;> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Sent from my Mobile device > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > Craig L Russell Architect, Oracle http://db.apache.org/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:craig.russ...@oracle.com P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
