Also, if it's not an Apache release, it probaly should not be hosted and listed at Apache to avoid confusion.
On Thursday, November 14, 2013, Ted Dunning wrote: > First few words should read "A disclaimer ..." > > I blame a combo of jet lag and *really* slow net link. Not the guy who hit > send without proofing, of course. > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Ted Dunning > <ted.dunn...@gmail.com<javascript:;>> > wrote: > > > > > I disclaimer to clarify that the 0.9.0 release is neither an Apache > > top-level project release nor an Apache incubator release is probably > good. > > A file name like DISCLAIMER might be good. > > > > I would worry about it being clear rather than being totally crafted by a > > true legal mind. > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 4:48 AM, P. Taylor Goetz > > <ptgo...@gmail.com<javascript:;> > >wrote: > > > >> The Strom project is just entering the incubator. We have promised our > >> community that we will issue a stable 0.9.0 release prior to switching > over > >> to the Apache release process. We are currently in a release candidate > >> process. > >> > >> Now that we are an Incubator project, but not yet releasing under the > >> Apache process, should we be including a disclaimer with our pre-Apache > >> releases stating so? > >> > >> It feels like we should have some sort legalese in place. > >> > >> - Taylor > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: > >> general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org<javascript:;> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: > >> general-h...@incubator.apache.org<javascript:;> > >> > >> > > > -- Sent from my Mobile device
