(Apologies if you get this twice. I'm having email issues) Doug,
The thread on members@ was titled "Committer Qualifications". I asked a question about the -1 vote on 9/7/13 and the reply I got was that committer voting does not have vetoes, and the document at [1] also seems to say that. The document at [1] also does not define "consensus" nor does it say that it must apply to committer votes. And, it might help to have a definition of "consensus" as definition 1b in [2] says that it does not require unanimity. [1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html [2] http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/consensus Thanks, -Alex On 10/1/13 8:21 PM, "Doug Cutting" <cutt...@apache.org> wrote: >Lots of people on this list are also on members@, and, so far, none have >objected to my statements. If this continues, it would indicate a lack of >controversy. > >Doug >On Oct 1, 2013 7:36 PM, "Justin Mclean" <justinmcl...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> > I don't find the discussion on members@ that comes to this conclusion. >> If >> > you cannot see members@ how do you know this? >> >> I was informed by a member on Flex private and here [1] which you >>already >> responded to. >> >> Thanks, >> Justin >> >> 1. http://markmail.org/thread/chfagblj72cv7zrt >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
