We vote in one of these people fairly regularly, and we've never rejected one yet as far as I recall. So I think that this solution has proved acceptable; the question is, how many of the podlings with a mentor shortage have a suitable candidate in them? I intend to find out.
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com>wrote: > On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > However, the > > problem here isn't identifying inactive mentors (as seen earlier, we > > already have everything we need for that) but rather how to replace > > them. So far, apart from the shepherd model, we haven't seen too many > > ideas on how to solve or at least partially address that problem. > > Recognizing merit and promoting from within the podling has a 100% > success rate. > > * Thift > * ESME > * Lucy > * ManifoldCF > > Our problem is not that we don't have a solution, it's that the IPMC > has not yet come to terms with the solution. > > Marvin Humphrey > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
