I mention ./LICENSE file from the source release and naturally assume this is the source release license. Then I assume Apache source release should be generally Apache licensed. This is not necessarily true for a binary release which can contain compatibly licensed components.
-- With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями, Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов, http://dataved.ru/ +7 916 562 8095 On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 1:43 AM, Carol Frampton <cfram...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > On 11/1/12 3 :59PM, "Carol Frampton" <cfram...@adobe.com> wrote: > >> >> >>On 11/1/12 7 :36AM, "Alexei Fedotov" <alexei.fedo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>Hello OmPrakash, >>> >>>I have notices that the LICENSE file has few additions two Apache >>>License: >>> >>>1. The second entry for Apache license. >>>2. Something like BSD license. >>> >>>The first item I cannot understand completely, the second one can be >>>resolved by adding BSD-like licensed files during build. >>> >>>So the question is why do you use non-standard LICENSE for the source >>>release? >> >>This is the LICENSE file for Apache Flex which was reviewed by our mentors >>prior to the release of Apache Flex 4.8.0-incubating. If I am not >>mistaken, this is the format that Apache and Adobe agreed to when Adobe >>donated the code to Apache. > > Ignore my comment. I was looking at the LICENSE file for the SDK rather > than the installer. > > Carol > >> >>Carol >> >>> >>>-- >>>With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями, >>>Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов, >>>http://dataved.ru/ >>>+7 916 562 8095 >>> >>> >>>On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:16 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On 30 October 2012 20:16, Om <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> After our first release as Apache Flex, we are following it up with >>>>>the Apache >>>>> Flex SDK Installer (Incubating) AIR application. >>>>> >>>>> The Apache Flex SDK Installer AIR application provides an easy, >>>>> single-click installation of the Apache Flex SDK and all its >>>>>dependencies. >>>>> This will make it suitable for working with IDEs such as Adobe >>>>>Flash >>>>> Builder, FDT, IntelliJ IDEA, FlashDevelop, etc. >>>>> >>>>> The application downloads the following dependencies: >>>>> >>>>> - The AIR sdk (Windows vs. Mac) based on the current platform >>>>> - Adobe Flash Player playerglobal.swc >>>>> - SwfObject >>>>> - Open Source Media Framework (OSMF) >>>>> - Adobe Text Layout Format (TLF) >>>>> >>>>> Optionally, the application will download these files as well: >>>>> >>>>> - Adobe BlazeDS >>>>> - Adobe embedded font support >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> This release was voted upon on the flex-...@incubator.apache.org list. >>>>> The >>>>> vote passed with 11 binding and 5 non-binding votes. Here is the >>>>>voting >>>>> thread: >>>>> http://markmail.org/thread/nbrflol6mkpu65ry >>>>> >>>>> The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here: >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC9/ >>>>> >>>>> The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective >>>>>platforms, >>>>> available here: >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC9/binaries/ >>>>> >>>>> The PGP keys of the two release managers - OmPrakash Muppirala (Source >>>>>kit >>>>> + Windows binaries) and Erik de Bruin (Mac binaries) are available >>>>>here: >>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/flex/KEYS >>>>> >>>>> Here is the tag for the release: >>>>> >>>>>https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/flex/utilities/tags/apache-f >>>>>l >>>>>ex-sdk-installer-1.0.8-RC9 >>>> >>>> There are 3 directories under that tag; I would expect to find the >>>> NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER files at the top level rather than >>>> under just one of them. >>>> >>>> The files do end up at the top level in the source archive, which is >>>>good. >>>> >>>> Also, the installerBadge directory tree does not appear to be included >>>> in the source archive - is that intentional? >>>> If so, why is it in the tag? >>>> >>>> The key C1708693 does not appear to be available from the normal >>>> public PGP key servers. >>>> >>>> Some of the source files don't have an EOL at EOF (e.g. >>>> ApacheFlexToolsStyle.css) in the SVN tag whereas they do have an EOL >>>> in the source archive. >>>> This is a packaging error, which can be sorted by ensuring that source >>>> files always have an EOL at EOF, or by changing the packaging >>>> instructions to not add the missing EOLs. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Please vote: >>>>> >>>>> [ ] +1 approve >>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion >>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >>>>> >>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> OmPrakash Muppirala >>>>> Apache Flex PPMC Member >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>>> >>> >>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>>For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>> >> >> >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
