Hello OmPrakash, I have notices that the LICENSE file has few additions two Apache License:
1. The second entry for Apache license. 2. Something like BSD license. The first item I cannot understand completely, the second one can be resolved by adding BSD-like licensed files during build. So the question is why do you use non-standard LICENSE for the source release? -- With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями, Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов, http://dataved.ru/ +7 916 562 8095 On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:16 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 30 October 2012 20:16, Om <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> After our first release as Apache Flex, we are following it up with the >> Apache >> Flex SDK Installer (Incubating) AIR application. >> >> The Apache Flex SDK Installer AIR application provides an easy, >> single-click installation of the Apache Flex SDK and all its dependencies. >> This will make it suitable for working with IDEs such as Adobe Flash >> Builder, FDT, IntelliJ IDEA, FlashDevelop, etc. >> >> The application downloads the following dependencies: >> >> - The AIR sdk (Windows vs. Mac) based on the current platform >> - Adobe Flash Player playerglobal.swc >> - SwfObject >> - Open Source Media Framework (OSMF) >> - Adobe Text Layout Format (TLF) >> >> Optionally, the application will download these files as well: >> >> - Adobe BlazeDS >> - Adobe embedded font support >> >> >> This release was voted upon on the flex-...@incubator.apache.org list. The >> vote passed with 11 binding and 5 non-binding votes. Here is the voting >> thread: >> http://markmail.org/thread/nbrflol6mkpu65ry >> >> The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here: >> http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC9/ >> >> The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective platforms, >> available here: >> http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC9/binaries/ >> >> The PGP keys of the two release managers - OmPrakash Muppirala (Source kit >> + Windows binaries) and Erik de Bruin (Mac binaries) are available here: >> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/flex/KEYS >> >> Here is the tag for the release: >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/flex/utilities/tags/apache-flex-sdk-installer-1.0.8-RC9 > > There are 3 directories under that tag; I would expect to find the > NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER files at the top level rather than > under just one of them. > > The files do end up at the top level in the source archive, which is good. > > Also, the installerBadge directory tree does not appear to be included > in the source archive - is that intentional? > If so, why is it in the tag? > > The key C1708693 does not appear to be available from the normal > public PGP key servers. > > Some of the source files don't have an EOL at EOF (e.g. > ApacheFlexToolsStyle.css) in the SVN tag whereas they do have an EOL > in the source archive. > This is a packaging error, which can be sorted by ensuring that source > files always have an EOL at EOF, or by changing the packaging > instructions to not add the missing EOLs. > >> >> >> Please vote: >> >> [ ] +1 approve >> [ ] +0 no opinion >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >> >> Regards, >> OmPrakash Muppirala >> Apache Flex PPMC Member > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
