On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com> 
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Per the IPMC's "Guide to Successful Graduation" [1] this is the
>>> optional, but recommended, community vote for us to express our
>>> willingness/readiness to govern ourselves.  If this vote passes then
>>> we continue by drafting a charter, submitting it for IPMC endorsement,
>>> and then to the ASF Board for final approval.   Details can be found
>>> in the "Guide to Successful Graduation".
>>>
>>> Everyone in the community is encouraged to vote.  Votes from PPMC
>>> members and Mentors are binding.  This vote will run 72-hours.
>>>
>>>
>>> [ ] +1  Apache OpenOffice community is ready to graduate from the
>>> Apache Incubator.
>>> [ ] +0 Don't care.
>>> [ ] -1  Apache OpenOffice community is not ready to graduate from the
>>> Apache Incubator because...
>>
>> In my opinion, the issue of binary releases ought to be resolved before
>> graduation.
>>
>> If the podling believes that ASF-endorsed binaries are a hard requirement,
>> then it seems to me that the ASF is not yet ready for AOO and will not be
>> until suitable infrastructure and legal institutions to support binary
>> releases (sterile build machines, artifact signing, etc) have been created
>> and a policy has been endorsed by the Board.
>>
>> One possibility discussed in the past was to have downstream commercial
>> vendors release binaries a la Subversion's example, which would
>> obviate the need for all the effort and risk associated with providing 
>> support
>> for ASF-endorsed binaries.  For whatever reason, the AOO podling seems not to
>> have gone this direction, though.
>>
>
> Let's look at the the TLP's that the IPMC has recommended, and the ASF
> Board has approved in recent months.  Notice that a fair number of
> them releae source and binaries, as does the OpenOffice podling:
>

Some further documentation of IPMC practice in this regard:

> Apache Lucene.Net -- releases source and binaries
>

IPMC voted to approve release, and vote post pointed to both source
and binary artifacts:

http://markmail.org/message/mt3xthcqqng7ftnw

> Apache DirectMemory -- releases source only
>
> Apache VCL -- releases  source only
>
> Apache Hama --  releases source and binaries
>

The people.a.o directory that was voted on by the IPMC is gone now.  I
suspect it included binaries as well. Certainly now that the podling
has graduated their release candidates include binaries:

http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/dist/0.5-RC4/

> Apache MRUnit --  releases source only
>
> Apache Giraph -- releases source only
>
> Apache ManifoldCF -- releases source and binaries
>

Their most recent vote was withdrawn because they graduated before the
vote completed, but that IPMC vote post also pointed to both source
and binary artifacts:

http://markmail.org/message/op7ofi2gudwfov3z

So the recent practice of the IPMC has been to approve releases with
source and binaries, but also to graduate podlings that do so.

Regards,

-Rob


> So I'm not quite sure in what way the ASF "is not ready" for a TLP
> that releases binaries, or what additional legal or procedural work
> needs to be done to enable this.  As far as I can tell ASF projects
> release binaries today.
>
> I agree, sterile buildbots and code signing are good things to have,
> and we are working with Infra on this today, and would continue to
> peruse these avenues as a TLP.
>
> In any case, shouldn't the question be whether the podling is ready
> for the ASF rather than whether the ASF is ready for the poding? ;-)
>
> -Rob
>
>
>> Marvin Humphrey
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to