On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net> wrote: > > On Jul 5, 2012, at 10:54 AM, Nicolas Lalevée wrote: > >> >> Le 5 juil. 2012 à 06:35, Stefan Bodewig a écrit : >> >>> On 2012-07-04, Dave Fisher wrote: >>> >>>> On Jul 3, 2012, at 12:06 PM, Nicolas Lalevée wrote: >>>>> Le 3 juil. 2012 à 19:00, Jukka Zitting a écrit : >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Nicolas Lalevée >>>>>> <nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org> wrote: >>> >>>>>>> The primary target for Easyant will be being a subproject of Ant. >>> >>> This may be EasyAnt's goal, I'm not entirely sure it matches Ant's goal. >>> >>> At one point in time every project entering incubation had to be >>> sponsored by an existing TLP or the board and it didn't imply the >>> podling would graduate to the existing TLP at all. The "you need a >>> sponsoring TLP" notion seems to have gone now. By the time EasyAnt >>> entered incubation Ant became the sponsoring TLP so there was one, not >>> because Ant was comitted to accept it as a sub-project IIRC. >>> >>> I'm not saying Ant would reject it, but it is not a no-brainer either. >>> This part of the discussion should be held on dev@ant 8-) >> >> I guess I'm the one who just misunderstood the Ant sponsoring thing. >> Let's to it properly yes. Let's start asking to EasyAnt dev first. > > Since Apache Ivy and Apache IvyDE are sub-projects of Apache Ant there is > some sense in EasyAnt having a place in the Apache Ant project. I see that > dev@ant did VOTE for sponsorship on a thread that you started [1], but I did > not see a lot of discussion about what made sense to the Apache Ant community. > > A few months earlier you pushed for the donation of Bushel into Ivy [2] which > was done. > > I see that EasyAnt has an old Google Group ML and this thread describes the > process from the EasyAnt community's perspective. [3] > > There is mention of Apache Ivy in the incubator four years prior, and we know > it ended up within the Apache Ant project.
Surely you're not suggesting that because Ant has *once* (A) sponsored a podling's incubation and (B) subsequently adopted that podling as a subproject that it is bound to do B for *every* A? Matt > > Regards, > Dave > > [1] > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ant-dev/201101.mbox/%3C3A73C5DA-E4A2-4CB6-8423-0A985246FA8E%40hibnet.org%3E > [2] > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ant-dev/201010.mbox/%3cb53d948c-5da9-48d8-b81d-2f8c44dba...@hibnet.org%3E > [3] > https://groups.google.com/group/easyant/browse_thread/thread/a8a87867cb42a5a5 > > >> >> Nicolas >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
