On 9 June 2012 02:46, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 9 June 2012 02:38, David Crossley <cross...@apache.org> wrote: >> sebb wrote: >>> As the subject says: is there any need for a separate >>> ReportingSchedule page now that we have podlings.xml? >> >> Some things to take care with, when we modify Clutch: >> >> Clutch based everything on the presence in ReportingSchedule >> and the name of the podling used there (lowercase, no spaces). > > Presence is roughly equal to status=current. > > Clutch currently uses the same transformation on the podling name atttribute. > > So this should not be much of a problem. > >> The main name in podlings.xml might be different, >> so some assumptions in clutch might need adjustment. > > If a name attribute in podlings.xml is wrong, then it needs fixing. > AFAIK, they all agree currently (IIRC clutch checks this). > >> Also the sequence of its data and hint-gathering process. > > Yes. > >> So a basic entry for a podling needs to be added to >> the podlings.xml file soon after acceptance. > > Yes.
Clutch now ignores the ReportingSchedule Wiki page and relies instead on the <reporting> tag in podlings.xml. The documentation referring to ReportingSchedule has been updated, but the page itself now needs to be updated to redirect users to podlings.xml. I don't have write karma for the Wiki so if someone else could update the page that would be great. >> -David >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
