On Jun 5, 2012, at 2:22 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: > > Based on some digging, I think what you are mostly facing is a battle of > perception. As not everyone has read or is privy to the private list > discussions, what they see is that you have a standing -1 vote from a mentor > who has expressed concerns on this list and the dev list as to whether or not > the diversity requirement has been met. It looks (and looked to me > initially) like an incubator project that is dominated by a single company > was trying to push itself through the incubation process at whatever cost and > before it was ready; something that most IPMC members would likely resist. > If this type of misperception happened at the incubator, what does the > foundation and flume community see? > > With the additional background I have read, it seems that the community is > much healthier than it appears and is acting on a lot of communication and > consensus that was driven on the private list. IMO, it would have been > better to ask Ralph if he was comfortable retracting his -1 prior to pushing > the general@ VOTE and if he was not, then participate in the diversity > discussion on general@ until some consensus has been reached.
I posted an email earlier today where I discussed my confusion over the diversity requirement. I'm not comfortable doing anything without getting some feedback on whether the diversity requirement, as currently stated on the wiki, is correct or whether diversity should simply be measured by how a project makes its decisions as Roy suggests. Ralph --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
