/me wondering if any of this feedback ever got channeled back to security@? (or was it only on @incubator lists)
Jukka Zitting wrote on Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 15:07:56 +0200: > Hi, > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 7:43 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. > <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > > Short of people.a.o/~luser/my-patch.tgz, I'm fairly certain that > > can't happen with an incubating podling. Everything under the space > > /dist/ must exist under a PMC. > > I totally agree for proper releases (with a source archive) blessed by > the PMC (on private@ if needed). However, this was neither, so I find > using the same location a bit troublesome. > > Anyway, it sounds like the case was handled reasonably well under some > fairly challenging constraints, so I'm not too worried about details > like this as long as this remains a one-off special case. I only > wanted to bring this up to make sure this doesn't become a standard > procedure without a broader discussion of how cases like this should > be handled. > > BR, > > Jukka Zitting > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
