On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <l...@toolazydogs.com> > wrote: > > On Feb 28, 2012, at 9:16 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Alex Karasulu <akaras...@apache.org> > wrote: > > I'm not sure that JSR specs are the same as old Cloudera code. JMHO. > > How about phrasing it as "old Sqoop code" instead. :-) > > Really it's about respect for existing users and others migrating to > Apache. It's also about respect for the people doing the work. That's > my understanding from discussions with the team at least. > > > I don't see the technical requirement that this code needs to stay at > Apache and not Cloudera. > > I agree that this potentially could be an issue, but whether it's a > technical requirement is up to the team who's doing the work. If > Apache feels that there is a requirement that no project releases > code/document/etc... under any package other than org.apache.* then > that should be clearly defined and communicated. At this point my > understanding is there is no such requirement. > > The Incubator is a work in progress, just like anything else here. I think this is a policy we should adhere too from this point forward. The technical problem is small in comparison to other issues this brings into play. -- Best Regards, -- Alex
