Hi, On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Sam suggested asking prodlings in category 2 to report back again next >> month on their progress towards solving the mentioned issues. > > Hey, now don't go and start spreading false rumors here. Particularly > as the archives are available for all to review. :-)
No misrepresentation intended, just an inaccurate generalization on my part. > What I would like to see is the Incubator start identifying PPMCs that > are stalled, and to consider what information they need (in future > reports) to help them (us) make such a determination. I am not > suggesting that this be made retroactive. Or that it be done > immediately. A plan would be fine: i.e., setting a date by which the > IPMC will have decided what information needs to be in such reports, > and a schedule by which the PPMCs need to start providing said > information. My suggestion is to ask the podlings now in category 2 to report again in May on their progress on the identified blockers. If there's been no measurable progress by then, we'll dig deeper to see what we can do. Podlings reporting in other months can be picked up for a similar oversight cycle over the coming months. By July we should then have a pretty accurate record of progress throughout the entire Incubator, including a clear list of podlings that are stuck and need help. Before the next quarterly report I'd rely on mentors to help the podlings identify and implement ways to move forward. And of course, if a podling or its mentors feel that more help is needed, asking on general@ or submitting an extra report is always a good idea. BR, Jukka Zitting --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
