Hi, On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com> wrote: > I spent some time unifying report formatting and fixing some minor > issues (like Stanbol needing an intro paragraph). I also pinged > NPanday and Zeta Components that have still not reported (both also > missed their previous report), asking them to report again next month > unless they already have something ready.
Zeta Components just submitted a late report, and Brett mentioned on npanday-dev@ that he'd write up something today. To clarify my above statement about missing previous reports, both NPanday and Zeta Components did report in December after missing the November slot. More generally, based on my earlier draft and the positive feedback I added a report summary [1] to the wiki page. I also included NPanday and Zeta Components in the categorization under "ready to graduate" and "low activity". The last NPanday report from December lists a number of issues before graduation, but looking at the project stats it seems to me like all of them would already be solved. Feel free to recategorize the project if there still are open issues. As discussed and mentioned in their late report, the key issue for Zeta Components seems to be low activity. Sam suggested asking prodlings in category 2 to report back again next month on their progress towards solving the mentioned issues. I think that's perhaps a bit too aggressive (most of these issues take more than a month to solve) so I'd be happy to just raise awareness of the issue within the podlings and ask for a summary of actions and progress in their May report. I've included wording like that in the report summary on the wiki page. Feel free to edit if another approach would be better. [1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2012?action=diff&rev1=78&rev2=79 BR, Jukka Zitting --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
