On 3 February 2012 23:17, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> wrote: > One way to make the load lighter is to try to make one decision at a > time.
+1 > Entirely selfishly, I suggest looking at the chair election > first. All nominees have said they back the radical reform plan. That plan as it currently stands reads, to me, as "nuke the IPMC and pass all responsibility for ensuring projects are adequately mentored to ComDev." As chair of ComDev I think the candidates ought to make it clear what is expected of that committee. I don't believe any of the current candidates have addressed that and therefore. I realise some people seem to think it is just about documentation, it is *not*. I say this from experience here and elsewhere. See tonights ComDev related posts on this list for an expansion of this point. How the candidates address this is up to them. A detailed plan would be great, but an honest commitment to work with ComDev rather than drop them in it as fast as is possible would also be OK. Ross --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
