I don't think one approach precludes the other. Agreed that incubator needs to keep going in the interim. Perhaps we can spin off groups one at a time, starting with just one to get the bugs worked out?
Karl On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 12:52:33AM +0100, Leo Simons wrote: >> The basic idea is to split the current single really big group that is >> the incubator into smaller groups that still cooperate and discuss and >> whatnot, but are accountable and overseen separately. These smaller >> groups become their own committees with their own VPs that report to >> the Board. >> >> Is that a reasonable re-statement of the abstract idea? Is that >> something we can all get behind? > > Completing such a task will be a lot of work, and who knows what complications > and disagreements lie ahead? We have an incremental solution in front of us > which mitigates some of our most pressing problems: the measured expansion of > Joe Schaefer's successful "experiment" to add PPMC Members who have > demonstrated a thorough understanding of the Apache Way to the IPMC. > > I don't support this boil-the-ocean revamp if it blocks the less ambitious > reforms. An indefinite period where release votes continue to drag on for > weeks is unacceptable. > > Marvin Humphrey > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
