On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:43 AM, ant elder <ant.el...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> Projects like PDFBox >>> or River are living examples of how active mentoring can turn around >>> the fortunes of a project. >> >> I'm sure the mentoring was ace but a large amount of why River turned >> around was down to its participants, without them and what they did no >> amount of mentoring would have fixed it. > > Obviously. > >> River incubated for four and a half years, and during that time had >> quite some "nothing much going on" type reports. >> >> If some of the recent suggestion were actual Incubator policy River >> would be at GitHub. > > Which suggestions? As has been repeatedly pointed out by Sam, all > that's being proposed here are ways to better detect and solve such > problems, which is exactly what happened with River
Terminating projects with active communities is the area of active dispute Robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
