Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote on Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 11:15:28 -0800: > On Dec 18, 2011, at 10:14 AM, Marcel Offermans wrote: > > and, IF it somehow requires Hadoop (see question above) that > > definition should probably be extended with something like "for > > Hadoop". > > It doesn't require it, so maybe it's fine to leave out Hadoop.
Even if it did, it would likely be a good idea not to refer to it by name in the resolution. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
