+1 for TLP and I could also help out with coding. LieGrue, strub
--- On Tue, 8/9/11, Pid <p...@pidster.com> wrote: > From: Pid <p...@pidster.com> > Subject: Re: Apache Rat TLP...? > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Date: Tuesday, August 9, 2011, 9:52 AM > On 05/08/2011 20:46, Robert Burrell > Donkin wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Kalle Korhonen > > <kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Agree that the scope of Rat alone is limited. You > mean if Rat proposed > >> to graduate as Apache Tools (or even Apache > Infrastructure Tools)? Rat > >> could start as the TLP and later become a sub > project once other tools > >> graduate and join Apache Tools as sub projects. > Makes sense to me as > >> there are a lot of other internally developed > tools that are not run > >> as projects. > > > > A name like Tools, talk of sub-projects and a scope > that wide might > > lead to worries about umbrellas > > > > We were thinking along more modest lines. Scope would > be focused just > > on the Continuous Delivery space. The tools (perhaps > noise, eye, tail, > > whisker) just being different products released by a > single > > development community. > > +1 to a TLP (non-binding) > > Also very interested in tools in C Delivery space. > > > p > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
