Whatever. This is just not a concern. Please end this thread. There is no problem, so this is just noise.
-g On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 00:44, Norbert Thiebaud <nthieb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton > <dennis.hamil...@acm.org> wrote: >> The problem here is that Rob and Sam and other well-known employees are >> being addressed as IBM employees here > > I perceive Sam answers and arguments to be consistent with the 'I am > an individual member of Apache' position. I may disagree with his > arguments or positions, but at least they are consistent with the > framework posited. > > I certainly cannot say the same for many of Rob's post... > > >>[..]They can operate as individuals but they must also honor the requirements >>on their conduct that are a consequence of their employment. > > and shall I emphasis: > > Rob Weir said: >>There are some things we must not talk about, especially things where >>competitors may be seen as arranging to reduce competition. We need to >>steer the conversation far from this. > > _we_ here means who ? I understood it, by default, to mean _we_ AF > member and by extensions the guests (like me) on this list.... > Am I to understand that AP members are bound by what-ever contractual > obligation Rob may or may not have with IBM ? > > Norbert > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
