On Jun 5, 2011, at 6:01 PM, Keith Curtis wrote: > On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote: >> >> Fully disagree. I encourage you to read the terms. >> >>> -Keith >> >> - Sam Ruby > > This is what the Wikipedia page on the Apache License says: > > "The Apache License, like most other permissive licenses, does not > require modified versions of the software to be distributed using the > same license."
You are confusing copyright and software licensing. You can modify software that is under the Apache license and use it in a proprietary product but you have to do it in a way that complies with the license and copyright law. You can use also use software that is under the LGPL in a proprietary product. The purpose of this list is not to explain how to do either of these. Ralph --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
