Ian Lynch wrote (04-06-11 14:39)
On 4 June 2011 13:30, Cor Nouws<oo...@nouenoff.nl> wrote:
Sam Ruby wrote (04-06-11 13:35)
Is there any reason to believe that the Apache License, Version 2.0 is
not an appropriate choice in this situation?
Yes. As expressed by many on this list and elsewhere: the Apache license
policy does not match for at least part of the LibreOffice project.
So starting with finding a common ground first, rather than starting with
the Apache model, would have been a better approach, IMO.
I'm not an expert in this but is seems to me that since you can derive a
copy left licensed product from an Apache licensed product but not the other
way round, it is in fact logical to start with Apache if both are to be
considered.
No, those people will not join that project under Apache.
Cor
--
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
- giving openoffice.org its foundation :: The Document Foundation -
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
