On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 6:24 AM, Andreas Kuckartz <a.kucka...@ping.de> wrote: > > So my question to IBM is: > Are you willing to consider open-sourcing IBM Lotus Symphony (even if > only parts of it) ?
While I work for IBM, I don't work for that part of IBM. That being said, I do believe that we already have an answer to that question. IBM has indicated that they are willing to contribute to a project made available under the Apache License, Version 2.0, which is a recognized Open Source license. Some of these contributions will be derived from the current IBM Lotus Symphony offering. As you are undoubtedly aware, IBM contributes to a number of projects, including Linux. Contributions to each project are made consistent with the license terms of that project. > If yes: which licenses would IBM be willing to consider ? Is there any reason to believe that the Apache License, Version 2.0 is not an appropriate choice in this situation? - Sam Ruby --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
