On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Simon Phipps <si...@webmink.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Simon Phipps <si...@webmink.com> wrote: >> > On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote: >> > >> >> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 4:11 PM, dsh <daniel.hais...@googlemail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > Besides that, I was asking myself why Rob is the only one who could >> >> > add such a tone to the proposal? If there would be consensus that open >> >> > and proactive collaboration with other parties is important it's up to >> >> > the community to add such a tone to the proposal. >> >> > >> >> > What do you think? >> >> >> >> The reason it is a wiki is exactly for this reason. Go for it! >> > >> > What are the exact rules, Sam? Those of us who aren't insiders will be >> very >> > reticent indeed about editing. >> >> Rules? :-) >> >> From http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html : >> >> "The incoming community needs to work together before presenting this >> proposal to the incubator. Think about and discuss future goals and >> the reasons for coming to Apache. Feel free to ask questions on list." >> > > Got any special rules for where the incoming community is already divided? > :-)
There are two common patterns at the ASF: RTC and CTR, which are Review The Commit and Commit Then Review. Most places operate with a CTR policy. If it turns out that there are controversial topics that need to be ironed out on list, then I encourage people to voluntarily follow a Review Then Commit policy, i.e., discuss proposed modifications here, attempt to build consensus and then proceed based on that consensus. Non-controversial changes can continue with as CTR. - Sam Ruby --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
