Simon Phipps <si...@webmink.com> wrote on 06/03/2011 02:33:21 PM: > > Your proposed text also does not recognise possibilities for collaboration > to protect the OpenOffice consumer end-user community in the interim while > your project sorts itself out. >
Can you state this in the form of a collaborative activity? I'm being neutral as to the intent or particulars on the wiki. I'm noting the kinds of activities. In the end the nature of the activity, with respect to the license and ASF policy, not the intent of the collaboration, is what will determine whether it is permissible. For example, mixing GPLv3 and Apache 2.0 with the intent of feeding starving children is not permissible, but providing a library that Wall Street tycoons can use to design butterscotch pudding swimming pools is permissible. Saying "collaboration...to protect the OpenOffice consumer" is not really sufficient. -Rob --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
