We now have several running threads. They overlap in content, and their subjects are, in some cases, rather uninformative.
I want to suggest some options to improve this situation to make it easier for ipmc members (and others) to follow the discussion and register their points of view. Option 1: a champion of the proposal takes inventory and starts a number of meaningfully-labeled threads for the subjects of ongoing discussion, and we all try to resist the urge to respond further in the original set. For those existing threads that have a coherent subject line and content, they could just be endorsed. Option 2: we use the wiki to stack up comments and concerns about the proposal. That does make it easier for anyone to show up and survey the territory. Option 3: you all ignore me, as is your privilege. If this were an in-person meeting, and I were the moderator (and pigs had wings ...) I'd be trying to sort out the areas of material disagreement and concern and focus attention onto them and away from everything else. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
