On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 2:05 AM, Noel J. Bergman <n...@devtech.com> wrote:
> Sim IJskes wrote:
>
>> The implementation that resides in com.sun could be renamed into the
>> org.apache.river.impl namespace without causing to much conversion
>> activity with the users of river. I believe there are strong feelings
>> about keeping to the original specifications.
>
> So are you saying that River will work towards eliminating com.sun, but does
> not feel that it needs to be done now?

It was clearly a misunderstanding. The current work is largely to put
all the loose bits into a coherent order, effectively creating a solid
QA environment (kudos!!), a non-trivial effort. So, the upcoming
release is all about getting into a consistent state, and doing so
with only bug fixes foud during QA setups. Hence, as Sim explains,
package names are seen too disruptive for that effort, as well as the
nature of the upcoming release is "drop-in replacement, bug fixes
only", no impact on users.

But, importantly, the community has committed itself to remove the
com.sun namespace as soon as that release is out.


Cheers
-- 
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java

I live here; http://tinyurl.com/3xugrbk
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/24svnvk
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to