Sim IJskes wrote:
> The implementation that resides in com.sun could be renamed into the
> org.apache.river.impl namespace without causing to much conversion
> activity with the users of river. I believe there are strong feelings
> about keeping to the original specifications.
So are you saying that River will work towards eliminating com.sun, but does
not feel that it needs to be done now?
> I know this is the prerogative of the IPMC to determine this, but your
> remarks deviate a bit from the consensus formed on river-dev IMHO,
> should we go back to the drawingboard and discuss your proposal within
> the PPMC?
Can you clarify? What remarks deviated from the consenus? Are you
referring to the graduation proposal, or just the comments regarding
com.sun?
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
