2010/11/8 Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <reto.bachm...@trialox.org> > > I described this parts of Clerezza because they seem to be quite close to > what you suggest for commons. As it is hard to share utilities without > having shared APIs for the core stuff our code deals with I think some > efforts in this area could have the greatest benefit. >
+1 Also in Clerezza there are some ontologies [1] defined which would be good to share in a "semantic repository" for ontologies. I think especially Clerezza and Stanbol would benefit from such a common repo. This, in my opinion, would fit well into semantic commons. Tommaso [1] : http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/clerezza/trunk/org.apache.clerezza.parent/org.apache.clerezza.rdf.ontologies/src/main/resources/org/apache/clerezza/rdf/ontologies/
