On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 06:41 -0400, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > On Aug 25, 2010, at 10:26 AM, Upayavira wrote: > > > On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 09:50 -0400, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > >> So, how does this get resolved? Shall I call a formal vote for the > >> IPMC? I rather like the name, but (somewhat) understand the > >> objections. That being said, I'm not all that clever at naming, so... > > > > You rather like which name?? > > ACF > > > > > My take: > > > > 1. come up with a name. > > 2. check for exixting uses of that name > > 3. if it passes #2 then get support of your PPMC > > 4. Propose it to IPMC. > > 5. Vote on the IPMC about the name. > > > > If you want, you can add #4a: discuss with IPMC whether a vote is really > > required for this, in which case you might be able to skip #5, but that > > process would probably be slower in the end! > > Well, I would argue we did all that, with the exception of a formal IPMC vote > (although we did ask here). It seemed to pass muster until a week later, a > fair amount of time after we went and made the changes.
Sure. I recognise I'm coming in late with my concerns. I personally don't like it as a name, as it is a descriptive style name that could be misleading, but at this point I'm not going to stand in its way. Upayavira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
