On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 22:53, Joe Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com> wrote: > It's optimized for success while making mentors potentially responsible for > failure (iow a project with crappy mentors will fail no matter how much they > grok apache).
Fair assessment, but those *are* the projects that I'm looking at. Those which have large enough Member support, can be fully self-supported. But you raise a larger question: if a project has crappy mentors, then how do we solve *that* problem? (new thread, please!) > Still have doubts about escalating the graduation decision to the board. Me too. I certainly believe that we can figure that out as we go. We don't have to hold up a new TLP-based podling based on solving the graduation answer today. Presumably, there would be a few months to explore. And certainly when the project *feels* it is ready, then the discussion will begin in earnest. Cheers, -g --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
