Thanks Jochen!
The reason for this question was: If RAT is really a generic tool, then
becoming
a TLP is imo a valuable option.
Otoh if RAT is hand tailored for ASF internal needs only, then it's really an
internal project and as such imo doesn't justify the TLP step and should rather
aim to be part of a 'bigger' thing.
Again I don't have a real opinion on this. I just wanted to get a feeling if
there is enough 'beef' for a TLP ;)
LieGrue,
strub
----- Original Message ----
> From: Jochen Wiedmann <jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com>
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tue, August 10, 2010 10:48:36 PM
> Subject: Re: Future of RAT
>
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>
> > Maybe I need to catch up with the current status: is RAT still mainly
>targeted
> > to ASF projects, or is it a general Release Audit Tool and as such also
>useful
> > for releasing GPLed or BSL style projects?
>
> Unfortunately, there is no clear reply to that question.
>
> Technically, RAT is independent from a certain license and could very
> well be used by other projects. However, I have no idea whether that
> is the case. I am unaware of any examples.
>
> Jochen
>
> --
> I Am What I Am And That's All What I Yam (Popeye)
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
