> we talked a bit about the issue tracker stuff and came to the conclusion > that we'd go with Jira. The point of having issues central in ASF infra > is quite striking and we agree here, that we don't want issues to be > tracked on an external server.
Thats good, b/c infra responded and they are not so happy with another tool > For the CI we will mostly likely want to setup Hudson inside ASF and > will most probably setup Arbit for it on an external server. More CI > cannot hurt, can it? ;) I think so :--) > I read on the infra pages, that our website is required to be generated > static HTML content. This is fine for us, since the desired systems does > basically do this. But I wounder how really dynamic stuff is handeled > here? E.g. having a blog is possible with static HTML, but what about > comment functionality? The mentioned blog url does support comments Christian > > Regards, > Toby > - -- > Tobias Schlitt tob...@schlitt.info GPG Key: 0xC462BC14 > a passion for php http://schlitt.info/opensource > Member of the eZ Components project http://components.ez.no > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAkvO1ZEACgkQ5bO3TcRivBThIQCgrdkAjAbxxsYS3vEKCrSHcnO1 > sBcAn3G26zmBZw9HhJodn6c3k5R2klJO > =fPJv > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
