On Tue February 16 2010 10:18:10 am Richard Hirsch wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote: > > 2) The tar unpacks into a "trunk" directory. That really should unpack > > into > > a "apache-esme-1.0" directory or similar. > > I'll change this for the next release. > > > 3) The "version" number in the pom is still 0.3.0-SNAPSHOT. Thus, if you > > build it, you get a snapshot war. Not a "huge" deal if we're not > > providing > > a binary war, but a bit unusual and unexpected. > > What would be better in the pom.xml: > <version>apache-esme-1.0</version>?
No, just 1.0-incubator or similar. If this is the 1.0 release, the version number should be 1.0. The 1.1 release would have a version of 1.1. > > 4) Snapshot dependencies. It has dependencies on snapshots from Lift. > > Not > > good for a "release" as the release isn't really reproducible. > > Do you mean: <lift.version>1.1-SNAPSHOT</lift.version>? I'll remember it > for the next release. Yep. > > 5) Very minor suggestion: if you are Java 6 only, you could exclude > > things like activation.jar, xml-apis, and most likely xerces to make the > > war a little > > bit smaller.. > > We are hoping to be JDK 1.5 "buildable" again in the future (crossing our > fingers...), so I wanted to leave these files in the release Ah. Ok. Makes sense. :-) Dan > > > As far as the legal bits go, looks ok for a source release, so +1. > > > > Dan > > Thanks > > > On Mon February 15 2010 10:05:43 am Richard Hirsch wrote: > > > The ESME community has voted on and approved the release of ESME 1.0. > > > We would now like to request the approval of the Incubator PMC for > > > this release. > > > > > Details of the ESME community vote can be found here: > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-esme-dev/201002.mbox/% > > 3C > > > > > fa2d9f451002120649u54cdd8b5red151033d655b...@mail.gmail.com%3e > > > > > > The candidate can be found at: > > > http://people.apache.org/~rhirsch/esme/<http://people.apache.org/%7Erh > > > irsch/esme/> > > > > > > See the CHANGES.txt file for details on release contents. The release > > > candidate is a tar archive of the sources in > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/esme/tags/esme-1.0-incubating/ > > > > > The MD5 checksum of the apache-esme-incubating-1.0- > > > src.tar.gz release package is > > > A4 9B 04 07 47 66 41 0C FE 01 2D 8B 5C 23 33 18 > > > > > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache ESME 1.0-incubating. > > > > > > Please vote to publish this release by Thursday, Feb 18 16:03 CET, > > > please include the testing you performed to arrive at your vote > > > > > > [ ] +1 Publish > > > [ ] 0 Abstain > > > [ ] -1 Don't publish, because... > > > > > > Below is a summary of the vote on the ESME mailing list > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Dick > > > > > > --------------- > > > > > > Sender-time Sent at 4:00 PM (GMT+01:00). Current time there: 4:04 PM. > > > ✆ to esme-...@incubator.apache.org > > > date Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 4:00 PM > > > subject [VOTE][RESULT] ESME 1.0 > > > mailed-by gmail.com > > > > > > > > > Hello All, > > > > > > Voting on the ESME 1.0 candidate release has concluded > > > > > > Results: > > > > > > 6 binding +1 vote > > > > > > Dick Hirsch +1 > > > Mrinal Wadhwa +1 > > > Vassil Dichev +1 > > > Ethan Jewett +1 > > > Anne Kathrine Petteroe +1 > > > Darren Hague +1 > > > > > > 1 non-binding +1 votes > > > > > > Daniel Koller +1 > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > -- > > Daniel Kulp > > dk...@apache.org > > http://www.dankulp.com/blog -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org http://www.dankulp.com/blog --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
