I can understand why Subversion should be made a top level project quickly, but I personally believe the namespace change is a reasonable request in order to graduate for all the same reasons that convinced me Pivot should change its namespace.
It sends the wrong message not to change given the importance of the Apache namespace, imho. Regards, Chris On 18 Nov 2009 05:18, "Brett Porter" <br...@apache.org> wrote: On 18/11/2009, at 3:40 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Justin Erenkr... Handling case by case is valuable. If it were com.somecompany.foo.* then there might be cause for concern in that it might not appear independent. I'm fine with Subversion keeping the current namespace, under the understanding that migrating in the future in a way that makes sense for their users is a good thing to do. This is similar to when a subproject goes TLP too - for example, I work on Archiva, which came from Maven, which is partially org.apache.maven.archiva.* and partially org.apache.archiva.*. - Brett --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: genera...
