Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Igor Burilo <igor.bur...@polarion.org> > wrote: >> isn’t guaranteed (you and Michael Pilato are sceptic regarding Serf). Nobody > > Hang on - let's be clear here: ra_serf passes *all* of the Subversion > regression tests just fine and has done so for several years now. (An > ra_serf slave is part of the standard buildbot runs.) > > ra_serf doesn't work with certain HTTP/1.0 proxies (because they don't > support chunked request bodies) and C-Mike has always been > uncomfortable with how ra_serf views editor drives. > > It's not like ra_serf isn't functional or feature equivalent; in > several areas, ra_serf is much much faster than ra_neon. And, I've > used ra_serf every day since I initially wrote it. =) -- justin
Yeah, the label of "skeptic" really doesn't fit me on this matter. I am 100% confident that ra_serf is the right place to invest our collective DAV-aimed energy. It is usable for most folks right now (and has been for a long time). It has bugs, but then what doesn't? The only strong sticking point for me is the editor drive item Justin mentions above. That's not so much a user-facing problem, but a develop/API-usage one. -- C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
