On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:29, Jochen Wiedmann <jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:59 PM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> > wrote: > >> Subversion client and server that doesn't use a DAV layer at all. The >> Subversion community has never released binaries -- ever -- not do we plan >> to. > > That would a completely new philosophy for an Apache project, which always > aimed > very heavily on distributions. It might either enforce to look at > legal aspects in a > different view - or lead to changing your philosophy. :-) Personally, > I don't see any > reason why things like creation of Windows binaries should be left to > outsiders. (Apart > from CollabNets business interests, which I wouldn't like to count.) > > Just recently, we had a very active discussion regarding Maven where > the emphasis > was laid very heavily on the distributable archives (binary and > source) as the endorsed > result of the release/vote process.
In httpd, we release tarballs and zips. Then some committers volunteer prebuilts. wrowe always built Windows releases, but I don't think that was ever mandated. The svn release process also produces tarballs and zips (in case that wasn't clear). We just don't do prebuilts. Cheers, -g --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
