On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 1:08 AM, Craig L Russell<craig.russ...@sun.com> wrote:
>
> On Jul 28, 2009, at 3:50 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 28, 2009, at 2:32 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>>
>>> I think we need to consider the risk to Apache of leaving the svn repo in
>>> a r/o state.
>>>
>>> According to the XAP status page,
>>> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/xap.html the copyright and distribution
>>> rights have not been verified, so IMHO the repository has not been vetted.
>>>
>>> I think we should disable svn access entirely.

as mentor, i'm reasonably confident that the rights are fine but the
status page was never updated

(FWIW i'm not particularly happy with the information there anyway:
it's not clear what the rights clause refers to. i would prefer
statements about particular rights transferred which could be signed
off as they are granted.)

>> That doesn't seem right either. I think members should still be able to
>> access it read-only.
>
> Fair enough. I just don't think it should be readable by the public.

IMO we're getting ahead of ourselves at this point

the first step when a podling is paused needs to be that the status
page is brought up to date. ideally, the source needs to be audited
and statements on the page checked.

- robert

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to