I would recommend that the public facing page for the project also be
modified since it will still show up in searches.
Ralph
On Jul 26, 2009, at 10:44 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
This thread really needs to be put to a conclusion as policy and
procedure. On the table we have:
Suspension would include:
-- disable the mailing lists (no need to moderate)
-- disable commit access (no need to review changes)
-- change the index of projects
The idea being to both flag it as dormant, and to remove the
oversight requirements that we have, by disabling anything requiring
oversight.
There seems to be some disagreement over the word "suspend", which
is being used in reference to an existing dormant state, not sending
someone to the Headmaster's office to be removed from school.
There also seems to be a disagreement over the idea that inactive
projects don't require oversight, but I feel that if we don't close
the mailing lists, they will not be properly moderated (moderators
still have to wade through spam looking for any faint signal), and
people would wonder why they send messages that get lost. And we
don't want to miss commit messages. It is best to structureally
disable the resources than to trust in lack of use.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
