Hi, i am not on the Commons PMC, i can only speak for myself.
> 1. It appears that d...@commons is the general mailing list for all commons > projects. Would a small project like sanselan get lost in the traffic? I don't think so - there are several other small components on commons. It looks like sometimes a components gets suddenly very active and sends more mails (like compress at the moment). Then - maybe after the release - it wents more silents and gives room for the other components. > 2. Most commons components have a "functional" name instead of a "fun" name. > Would Sanselan need to be renamed, e.g. Commons Image, or would it be ok to > have the sub-project called Sanselan, or Commons Sanselan? There are Components like Betwixt or Jelly - i think Sanselan would fit perfectly. However, I read a discussion were new components are prefered to get functional names. > 3. Would any changes be required from the existing packaging of Sanselan? > For example, packages are named org.apache.sanselan. Would these need to be > renamed to org.apache.commons.sanselan (or less fun name as above)? I don't know any other components which have not commons the package names. However, this is from my youngster expierence. Senior comitters may have other opinions. But I just wanted to say that I really like Sanselan and it helped me lots of times. I strongly believe that it would be a loss if you would let Sanselan go. Cheers, Christian --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
