On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 04:51 -0400, James Carman wrote: > A non-disclosure agreement (NDA) is required to be an apache > committer? Since when?
No. The other way around. If you want to sign an NDA agreement in relation to gaining access to a TCK or something, you need to be a committer. Only committers are allowed to sign them. That is what is being said. A blanket all committers must sign an NDA would be the death of Apache, eh? Upayavira > On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 4:48 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> How to get or sign this NDA to view current draft spec? Is it required to > >> be part of the EG? > > > > no, that is an Apache thing. You need to be committer to sign the NDA. > > The NDA on the other hand gives you access to TCK etc. In case of > > WebBeans... > > this shouldn't be a big deal (TCK) since it is actually Apache 2.0 licensed. > > > > When this project is accepted, you will be an Apache committer and we can > > work on the NDA. > > > > @Vote: You asked about the vote, why not planing to start a vote > > beginning of next > > week ? This will give some folks some more time to read the proposal > > etc. No need > > to rush, isn't it ? > > > > -M > > > >> > >> Gurkan > >> > >> > >> > >> ----- Original Message ---- > >> From: Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> To: general@incubator.apache.org > >> Sent: Monday, October 6, 2008 10:23:22 PM > >> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal] > >> > >> I am part of the EG, but I can't share the draft PDFs. > >> You need a NDA for that. > >> > >> -M > >> > >> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> Hi Kevan, Matthias; > >>> > >>> The project current code base is in the sourceforge --> > >>> http://bigfaces.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/bigfaces/webbeansimpl/. > >>> I am developing the remaining pieces of the specification continuously. > >>> > >>> About Implementation : So far, only Web Beans specification that is > >>> published is EDR-1, in this EDR-1 there is no API contract of the > >>> specification. So when I started to implement the specification, I > >>> created my own API. But now, I looked at the > >>> http://seamframework.org/WebBeans address and it defines the API > >>> contracts and some of the concerns explained in the EDR-1 are changed. I > >>> am trying to adapted my implemented API contracts with this unpublished > >>> API. I explicitly commented on these changes in the source code. I think > >>> there is no so much differences. > >>> > >>> There are two folder in the implementation, webbeans-api is the API and > >>> webbeans-impl is the implementation. All the unit test are contained in > >>> the webbeans-impl folder. > >>> > >>> Thanks; > >>> > >>> Gurkan > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> ----- Original Message ---- > >>> From: Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> To: general@incubator.apache.org > >>> Sent: Monday, October 6, 2008 3:34:34 PM > >>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal] > >>> > >>> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> On Oct 3, 2008, at 4:48 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hi to all; > >>>>> > >>>>> I have posted a proposal about the project, named OpenWebBeans. > >>>>> > >>>>> It is in the WIKI, its address is > >>>>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenWebBeansProposal > >>>> > >>>> I made a few minor editorial updates (spelling/grammar) and one wording > >>>> change "Geronimo will include" ==> "Geronimo may include". > >>>> > >>>> Can you point us to the current project? I couldn't find it on > >>>> sourceforge. > >>>> > >>>> Last I recall Guice was planning on an Apache licensed WebBeans > >>>> implementation. Is that still their plan? Any discussions with their > >>>> project? > >>> > >>> really ? Interesting. > >>> The "JBoss WebBeans RI" is Apache 2.0 licensed as well (and it > >>> looks like their TCK will be as well) > >>> > >>> See here: > >>> http://seamframework.org/WebBeans > >>> > >>> -Matthias > >>> > >>>> > >>>> --kevan > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Matthias Wessendorf > >>> > >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > >>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Matthias Wessendorf > >> > >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
