On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 10:51 AM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A non-disclosure agreement (NDA) is required to be an apache
> committer?  Since when?

that is my understanding. The NDA to get access to the TCK for instance ?
I always thought you need to be a committer. At least in MyFaces we were
doing that (to get access to the TCK).

I am only talking here about the TCKs, no other (more general) things.

-M

>
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 4:48 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> How to get or sign this NDA to view current draft spec? Is it required to 
>>> be part of the EG?
>>
>> no, that is an Apache thing. You need to be committer to sign the NDA.
>> The NDA on the other hand gives you access to TCK etc. In case of WebBeans...
>> this shouldn't be a big deal (TCK) since it is actually Apache 2.0 licensed.
>>
>> When this project is accepted, you will be an Apache committer and we can
>> work on the NDA.
>>
>> @Vote: You asked about the vote, why not planing to start a vote
>> beginning of next
>> week ? This will give some folks some more time to read the proposal
>> etc. No need
>> to rush, isn't it ?
>>
>> -M
>>
>>>
>>> Gurkan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----
>>> From: Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>>> Sent: Monday, October 6, 2008 10:23:22 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal]
>>>
>>> I am part of the EG, but I can't share the draft PDFs.
>>> You need a NDA for that.
>>>
>>> -M
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> Hi Kevan, Matthias;
>>>>
>>>>  The project current code base is in the sourceforge -->  
>>>> http://bigfaces.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/bigfaces/webbeansimpl/.
>>>>  I am developing the remaining pieces of the specification continuously.
>>>>
>>>> About Implementation :  So far,  only Web Beans specification that is 
>>>> published is EDR-1, in this EDR-1 there is no API contract of the 
>>>> specification. So when I started to implement the specification, I created 
>>>> my own API.  But now,  I looked at the http://seamframework.org/WebBeans 
>>>> address and it defines the API contracts and some of the concerns 
>>>> explained in the EDR-1 are changed. I am trying to adapted my implemented 
>>>> API contracts with this unpublished API. I explicitly commented on these 
>>>> changes in the source code. I think there is no so much differences.
>>>>
>>>> There are two folder in the implementation, webbeans-api is the API and 
>>>> webbeans-impl is the implementation. All the unit test are contained in 
>>>> the webbeans-impl folder.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks;
>>>>
>>>> Gurkan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message ----
>>>> From: Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>>>> Sent: Monday, October 6, 2008 3:34:34 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal]
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Oct 3, 2008, at 4:48 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi to all;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have posted a proposal about the project, named OpenWebBeans.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is in the WIKI, its address is
>>>>>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenWebBeansProposal
>>>>>
>>>>> I made a few minor editorial updates (spelling/grammar) and one wording
>>>>> change "Geronimo will include" ==> "Geronimo may include".
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you point us to the current project? I couldn't find it on 
>>>>> sourceforge.
>>>>>
>>>>> Last I recall Guice was planning on an Apache licensed WebBeans
>>>>> implementation. Is that still their plan? Any discussions with their
>>>>> project?
>>>>
>>>> really ? Interesting.
>>>> The "JBoss WebBeans RI" is Apache 2.0 licensed as well (and it
>>>> looks like their TCK will be as well)
>>>>
>>>> See here:
>>>> http://seamframework.org/WebBeans
>>>>
>>>> -Matthias
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --kevan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>
>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>
>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to