On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 18:14 +0100, Aidan Skinner wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Do you have any ideas on how to make sure that people read and understand > > the documentation, either the existing or proposed update? > > I suspect it's an ordering issue (and conflation of the concept of PMC > and PPMC, rather than PMC and IPMC). The section on who's vote is > binding is buried relatively deeply in the last sentance of the 3rd > paragraph, immediately before the information you were probably > scanning the page for in the first place if you'd read the page before > and wanted a refresher. > > I think a seperate "How to vote" that both the release page and the > PPMC page can reference would help clarify things. Might not help with > people who just don't read it in the first place, or read it and then > forget how it's suppoused to work but..
And by the sounds of it, it would enable those of us that often answer "so what next?" questions to answer with a URL rather than a long and tedious explanation. Thus, I'd appreciate it. Upayavira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
