On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:27 AM, Aidan Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 11:21 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mar 26, 2008, at 3:07 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > > > > That seems reasonable since it removes any motivation for > > > "investigation" and is likely to be very rare. > > > > I don't think there is a good way for people to tick a box "prefer not > > to tell". Maybe we should work on this angle a bit. > > I think there's definately something to be said for this. In Qpid's > case it's not so much about an unwillingness to reveal it (it is, > after all, pretty easy to figure out) but about people not being > allowed to make things that could be construed as public statements > about the company they're employed by. Oh, and the point I wanted to make was: I think this is something that will become increasingly common as more non-software companys Get the Free Software model, and having clear establish practices for dealing with it will be helpful. - Aidan (who should be asleep) -- aim/y!:aidans42 g:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://aidan.skinner.me.uk/ "We belong to nobody and nobody belongs to us. We don't even belong to each other." --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
